In developing
countries the productivity gain in agriculture has not only raised the farmers’
income but also provided new livelihood opportunities. The success in agriculture has provided the
basis for economic diversification and has continued to an important
determinant of economic growth and poverty reduction. It is true for most developing countries.
Small scale farming is
often questioned that it can potentially be a ladder out of poverty. What matters in achieving the desired goal of
economic growth and poverty reduction is not the small scale of farming per se but
how the farming and the support system are organized and interlinked. The main agenda of the day is whether the
agriculture development is well focused or not, and whether the support systems
are well integrated or not.
If agriculture has to
be the engine of growth and generate wealth and jobs for rural households, the
angle of looking at agriculture needs to be shifted altogether. It requires economic perspective and
accordingly organized and supported within the parameters environmental limits
and biodiversity much more pragmatically.
The ultimate aim
should be that farmers earn an income that justifies them to continue to be a
farmer and have dignified life. The support
systems should then be organized in meeting that goal in business model in
which the investment in agriculture can still be far less than the agriculture
GDP. Only then the agriculture being the
engine of growth is justified.
When the whole economy
is operating in market economy model, the agriculture cannot be left
otherwise. The whole spectrum of the
support system necessary for agriculture development needs be packaged and
provided in an integrated manner and not in isolation, often in conflicting
manner.
Investment is necessary
for using right technologies including seeds and plants, irrigation system,
fertilizers and plant protection options.
The level of investment needs to be confirmed at the policy level
depending upon what level of productivity gain is desired.
In agriculture,
making the technologies available is not the end of the game. Making the technologies used by the farmers
is inevitable for which credit support is imperative.
Providing credit in
agriculture is not as straight as it is being provided by commercial banks to
any other commercial venture. Credit to
farmers is an investment, a sustainable investment for sustainable agriculture
for which reason there is provision under Agreement on Agriculture (AOA) of WTO
for making subsidies available to the farmers of developing nations. A subsidized credit indeed plays a pivotal
role in adopting new technologies and enterprises in agriculture.
The small scale
production by small scale farmers gains size that justifies transporting and marketing
the produce at a distant market when farmers are organized in a cooperative
mode. This is an area where private
sector can be attracted. But the private
sector will only come in where the level playing fields in terms of statutory policy
and support systems exist, and it is transparent and workable.
What is still to be
put in place in most developing countries is the insurance system. A farmer though provided with subsidized inputs
and subsidized credit, cooperative and marketing support still feel unsecured against
disasters becoming more frequent than ever before. Indeed insurance should be roped in wherever subsidized
technologies and credits, and cooperative supports are being provided.
Agriculture development
is intertwined with the mandate of food and nutrition security, and in it the
whole energy and scope for economic approach for import substitution and export
growth, employment, reducing rural-urban migration, are lost. This mandate costs and it is difficult to
achieve without investment but that investment must not be seen or considered also
for economic entrepreneurial engagement.
The two, the security and economic models, cannot be one and therefore they
should be treated separately because their key results are different.
With all the above
operating, what remains is regulatory system with the motif to ensure not only
the quality aspect but also to ensure the whole system is operating as
desired.
It is many decades
now since developing countries have been engaged in providing subsidized agriculture
inputs, constructing infrastructure including irrigation and road access, and
product marketing to ensure stable, predictable and remunerative prices. Through such instruments, the governments
have created a lower risk environment for agriculture innovation and increased
its affordability for small scale farmers with considerable access.
The issue is not whether
the small scale farmers would succeed but how to make sure they do. Investment in agriculture cannot be
considered a welfare bill but a stimulus to trigger the national goal of well-being
and economic development. One without the
other remains unaccomplished.
No comments:
Post a Comment