The number of people
below poverty line has come down but the number of those vulnerable to poverty
has increased. The progress made on
achieving millennium development goal can still be potentially reversed if
planned investment is not made sufficiently for food security and adaptation to
climate change, and climate smart agriculture.
There is an
opportunity to recast policy directions and priorities as well as the existing
regional cooperation mechanism in coping with multiple challenges of balanced
and sustainable development. Right
perspective, ensuring environmental and social sustainability, cost-effective
financing for technologies and trade are the cornerstone for increasing
agriculture production and productivity.
Exploring policy
options and adopting suitable approaches for food and nutrition security,
energy security and adaptation to climate change needs to be translated into planned
interventions in education, health and agriculture development. The downstream consequences of financial
crunch should not negatively impact to these three primary areas of
interventions.
What is needed is
effective social protection measures to protect the poor and the vulnerable
groups, particularly small farmers, women and children when nothing more can be
done. It must be backed by a
comprehensive framework encompassing sustainable agriculture and forestry,
climate change adaptation and mitigation, social protection and well
functioning market.
The developing
nations are yet to benefit sufficiently from North-South technology transfer,
exchange of information, experiences on development policies and governance,
organizational structures, enabling regulatory framework, networking and
consultations. The development planning
and policies are yet to be businesslike.
The goal of achieving
food security and sustainable agriculture require enhanced investment in
agriculture sector and it should encompass public and private sector
partnership to increase productivity and promote efficient and sustainable
food-production, post-harvest practices and loss reduction, marketing and
trade. The great Indian scientist Dr.
M.S. Swaminathan says, “If agriculture fail, nothing will succeed.”
There needs to be an
enabling policy environment to promote and encourage the adoption of
sustainable agricultural practices. Research
and development on sustainable agriculture including its climate adaptation and
mitigation, along with sharing of experience and transfer of best practices
should be ushered at all time.
Adoption of
technologies and enterprises in agriculture sector is determined by the prices
paid to the farmers. The prices paid to
the farmers should reflect the incentives needed for them to remain engaged in
agriculture production. The credit
linked back ended capital support for agriculture enterprises has been very
successful elsewhere. Vocational
training, business incubation, credit-linked back ended capital support,
technical support, product price and marketing needs to be packaged as one
integrated program which ensures high adoption rate, synergies, sufficient
safety net and confidence. The primary
cause of not being successful is the lack of integration, coherence and concerted
effort.
Agriculture
development cannot be looked at too simplistically. It embraces the whole life system indeed. Investment on effective food storage
facilities and its network at national level, food bank, crop and livestock
insurances are only few to name to cope up with climate change and as disaster
mitigation strategies.
Efficient water use
in agriculture holds the key success.
Agriculture cannot continue with the primitive wasteful irrigation
system. More advanced micro-irrigation for
horticultural crop with inbuilt integrated fertigation system is the need of
the hour. Likewise modern nurseries at
national and local levels should be making available and enabling farmers to
plant the right kinds of planting materials.
Without these interventions the horticulture could potentially be a
history. In rural setting, transition
technologies such as bio-gas at household level are needed and not necessarily
the large technology initiatives.
Public-private cooperation in these areas of intervention is vital. Without the one another is disabled.
If farmers on the two sides of a international boundary have to compete, the level playing fields have to
be understood and equalized or else one will destabilize the other superficially. The one at losing end has no option to forgo
production unless the level playing field is equalized. A thorough understanding, coordinated
response and comprehensive framework for action are needed for not letting
rural livelihood security to suffer.
No comments:
Post a Comment